Cataclysm study · geography is not a guilt map
Track the event.
Test the cause.
A disaster can disclose vulnerability, neglected stewardship, or moral response. Without an authoritative interpretation, it cannot tell us that the people struck were worse sinners than those spared.
“Suppose ye that these Galilaeans were sinners above all the Galilaeans, because they suffered such things? I tell you, Nay.”
Storm occurrence, severity, fatalities, injuries, and damage
Open source ↗FEMADisaster declarationsOfficial declarations, affected areas, and assistance categories
Open source ↗NIFCWildfire statisticsFire counts, acreage, causes, annual reports, and current activity
Open source ↗NASAFIRMS fire monitoringNear-real-time active-fire, burn-area, and smoke observations
Open source ↗Could this inference survive a map?
Every box matters. Omitting control locations turns coincidence into a moral story.
Correspondence describes resemblance between demonstrated conduct or collective response and a textual pattern. It never converts geography into guilt, or a disaster into a verdict about the people struck.
Locked until the event, geography, and primary physical source are recorded. Separate the hazard from its interpretation first.